Pin It

Widgets

The Unremembered

Posted by Steve the Bookstore Guy On Wednesday, April 27, 2011

The hardest part of being a book reviewer is putting together a negative review of a book when you don't want to. This happens for a variety of reasons, but mainly has to do with the author himself (or herself as the case may be). If we hate the author, or absolutely hate a novel, writing a scathing review is simple and enjoyable--therapeutic even. But with a novel like THE UNREMEMBERED, well, we almost didn't even write this up. But then we realized the potential disservice we would be doing you, the readers, and the author, Peter Orullian, by leaving this unreviewed.

We are going to tackle this review a little differently from the other negative reviews we have written. Hopefully it comes across as constructive rather than destructive. Peter is generally regarded as a good guy by people we know. As you readers may be aware, we are alpha readers for several big-name authors. They send us an early draft of the completed novel, and we read it over and give detailed feedback on what we liked and/or had problems with. We are going to do the same sort of thing here for Peter Orullian--albeit in a spoiler-free way so you readers can still make your own decision at the end. That's right folks, we are going to be the "nice guys" today. Don't get used it.

Let's start off with the good from Peter's debut novel. The cover art is absolutely beautiful. It in itself will sell the novel to a good number of people. The map inside is perhaps the single best map we have ever seen in a fantasy novel--and we've seen some great ones. Our good buddy Isaac Stewart--you know him as the artist from the maps in the MISTBORN series and THE WAY OF KINGS--told us once that the person who did this map deserves a Hugo. We agree.

We aren't going to lie to you, that was about it for us. This book was a huge disappointment. Where does this disappointment originate? Well, from the beginning. From the story itself.

THE UNREMEMBERED starts off with a boy from a small town. He is fantastic with a bow. He has stars in his eyes about life outside the town. When out hunting one day, a mysterious and evil creature chases him, threatening his life. Upon returning to his village, he finds that two foreign strangers have come. They soon tell our main character and one of his friends that they need to leave their village because the evil bad guys are coming for them. Have you heard this before? We have. We've seen this story from Terry Brooks, and more specifically from Robert Jordan. At first we thought it just a coincidence arising from the "coming of age" type story we were reading. But as the novel progressed, we soon were predicting each plot point specifically as it came...based on the plot and progression of THE EYE OF THE WORLD.

THE UNREMEMBERED isn't just loosely similar to THE EYE OF THE WORLD. It follows it near exact. Think of every major plot point from the first Wheel of Time novel, from beginning to end, and you can find a parallel in Orullian's novel. Suppose we were in a writing group with Peter. The first thing we would have pointed out is this blatant similarity. Perhaps it is the industry's desire to have another Wheel of Time, but isn't this taking it a bit too far?

The characters follow the same template that Jordan's do. We could point at character and say, "Oh, this is Mat. That is Rand." One of the characters is Moiraine, only as a dude. The other is Lan, but a chick. Simply reversing the gender of roles is not enough to make it new. Now there are fans of this novel out there who are starting to foam at the mouth a bit. Doubtless they will want to point out that not every character has a WoT counterpart. True enough. But over half do, and most of the main players.

One of the mistakes it seems all first-time fantasy authors make is the whole "invented word syndrome." We've been trying our hand at writing, and we've each been guilty of this. Too many made-up terms for normal words doesn't add any freshness. They don't add uniqueness. All they do is pull a reader out of the moment as they spend a few moments trying to figure out what the word actually means. Words and names littered with apostrophes used to be super vogue. No so much anymore. Even the authors out there with the highest learning curves are careful about what they make up. Don't make it harder for the reader than it needs to be.

One of the storytelling techniques that bothers us the most is when information is completely withheld. "I'll tell you when you're ready." "This is not the time to discuss that." "I'm a mysterious bastard, and will berate you for not knowing what I refuse to tell you." These types of responses happen every single chapter. We could only shake out heads in dismay as the Moiraine/Allanon hybrid character would tell the other characters that there wasn't time to explain anything...as they rode slowly for days at a time...or as they sit around a campfire talking about history for hours at a time. To us, this isn't fair to the readers, nor is it good storytelling.

Like most first-time authors, transitions are extremely rough. There is a side story being told, for example, that when introduced has no time-anchor on it. It comes at a confusing time that immediately cripples the momentum of the scene it interrupts (can't get more specific than that due to heavy spoilers--it's pretty early on). We literally read that section a half-dozen times trying to figure out just what the heck was going on, and when it was happening. Part of this has to do with Orullian describing things that don't need it, while ignoring what needs clarification. These are the types of things that, as alpha readers, we point out. Even the most derivative story can be enjoyable if it is smooth and accessible.

We are ultimately left feeling the Orullian played it incredibly safe with THE UNREMEMBERED. Though it has some interesting theology mixed in, it still feels like EYE OF THE WORLD rewritten. The characters act in unbelievable, yet utterly predictable ways. This novel needed a few more heavy drafts in our opinion.

We've said a lot of negative stuff here. We just didn't like it at all. Hate? No. We didn't hate it. THE UNREMEMBERED feels half-done. It feels like a novel still in its draft form. It feels like a copy. The good news is that Orullian still has time to make it right. It's our opinion that you can't play it safe as a writer anymore. Writers have to take risks. Orullian isn't a bad writer, he's an inexperienced one. A lot of these issues can get worked out through simple experience. But the story? Sorry man, this needs a radical shift. There are readers out there that will like this novel due to its absolute similarity to that Jordan/Tolkien/Brooks story we've all read dozens of times from dozens of authors. But that isn't good enough for us. It isn't good enough for the thousands upon thousands of discerning readers out there.

We doubt Peter Orullian will read this review. That's fine. Regardless, we want him to know that we really WANT him to get better. Twist the crap out of this clichéd story with its clichéd characters. Stop playing so safe and predictable.

Again, writing a negative review like this is never easy. We could have sugar-coated it, or completely swept our opinions of this under the rug. No insults here, just our honest thoughts. You decide if you want to read this novel or not.

Recommended Age:
16 and up.
Language: Nope.
Violence: Mixed bag here. Sometimes it's well done, other times it is completely terrible--transitions and clarity are important in action scenes.
Sex: Rape is talked about pretty frankly.

9 comments

  1. Brentus Said,

    Ever since The Maze Runner it really annoys me when people withhold information for no reason other than to drag out the mystery until later in the book. It breaks the fourth wall when it's obvious the character's only reason for being unforthcoming is that you are still in the first part of the book.

    I'm curious: separating originality from the other issues you brought up, how would you have rated this book if you had never read Jordan, Brooks, etc. before?

    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM

     
  2. That's a hard question to answer. Since the book follows THE EYE OF THE WORLD's plot near exact, it's impossible to divorce it from the comparison. Especially since this book likely wouldn't exist in its current form WITHOUT the likes of Jordan and Brooks.

    However that said, there are quite a few writing issues that I mentioned in the review. Even without the derivative plotting and story, the transitions were very rough, the conversations were often eye-roll inducing, the action muddled in places, and the descriptions were overly long and dull. I, personally, still likely wouldn't have rated it any better.

    That being said, this is all an opinion. Maybe you'll like it. I just feel that the novel in its current state seems more like a rough draft than a final version. Orullian could certainly grow and shatter all our preconceptions, but I worry that by then it will be too late.

    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 11:30 AM

     
  3. JustaStaffer Said,

    I feel like this novel got a ton of buzz. Starting to make me wonder if the literary hype machine works like Hollywood's. The more money spent on advertising the more the film needs it. If I have to watch one more preview for an Adam Sandler movie I'm going to flip.

    Posted on April 27, 2011 at 2:18 PM

     
  4. Jason Said,

    I'm glad it's not just me. I've been trying to read it, and am pretty sure I'm just going to put it down. I could get by with the familiar plot if the rest were good, but it just isn't.

    From the very beginning the parallels to Terry Brooks (in particular early Brooks) jumped out at me. I hadn't noticed the Eye of the World parallels, but looking back on what I've been through, I see them clearly. It's a real shame that it doesn't hold up.

    Posted on April 30, 2011 at 7:43 AM

     
  5. -Slamel- Said,

    I feel like this is the derivative book that every one of us attempted to write when we first read The Wheel of Time and wanted to write our own epic story. Granted Peter did it with more ability and more style than we did when we were 13 years old, but that really doesn't say much for him, or change the fact that he got published by completely ripping off his predecessors. Makes me very grumpy.

    Posted on April 30, 2011 at 4:21 PM

     
  6. K Said,

    Sure the book is derivative but what isn't nowadays. And for you guys who bow at the altar of Steven Erickson to complain about made-up words in this book. Seriously? Have you seen the size of the Malazan encyclopedia?

    Posted on May 10, 2011 at 3:27 PM

     
  7. There is a difference between an novel with familiar aspects to it (all novels have something familiar), and a novel that is so derivative that you've already read it a dozen times. Personally, I expect more effort in the planning of a novel that just taking the plot progression of another novel and using it. Did you read THE UNREMEMBERED? If so, then surely you see what I'm talking about. And I'm not the only one who has noticed the blatant similarities. The only way you wouldn't see this as a fan-fic type copy of THE EYE OF THE WORLD is if you hadn't read Jordan's novel. And if you hadn't read Terry Brooks. Maybe you can excuse that, but I can't, and neither can a large number of readers who feel manipulated by it.

    If you read the review above, you wull seen the part where it is mentioned that even the authors with the highest learning curves (Erikson for example) are careful where they use made up words. Erikson, for example, has anthropological backing within the novel for each race's terms. For each made up word. Also, he doesn't just make up a word for a normal thing. And he explains what everything is. In my opinion, Erikson makes up words because he needs to. In this novel I saw no reason or need for the made-up words, therefore in my eyes making them fair-game for complaints.

    Posted on May 10, 2011 at 4:17 PM

     
  8. guessingo Said,

    I thought about reading this book after I saw some of the interviews that Orullian did with Martin, Sanderson, and others. They were very good and I thought this guy might be interesting. Then I remember that you guys didn't like this book. So I decided to go back and check out the review again. I did some google searches and alot of people are making the Jordan comparison.

    I am wondering if TOR intentionally pushed the author to go in this direction? They may be trying to get some more play off of Jordan as the series is ending. It is there decision to publish right? They had to know that this is a WoT knockoff.

    As far as the weak writing. If it is that bad, why would TOR publish it and not make the author spend more time on it. It sounds like they put money into the marketing. So I would figure they would want to at least get that polished. They pay him an advance. It is not like its a salary so they have to pay him more money before moving forward?

    If someone is going to write Jordan fan fiction, they might have more success with a 50 Shares of Rand (or maybe Padan Fain) kind of thing. It would just be a few more spankings anyway.

    Posted on October 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM

     
  9. YES! I'm about 1/3 of the way through the book now, & as I'm reading I just keep thinking that it's like Wheel of Time all over again, all the way down to the Warder (the Far) & the Aes Sedai (the Sheason), except gender flipped. I'm so annoyed by it that I did a google search for "The Unremembered copies Wheel of Time" & found your post.

    Posted on August 13, 2013 at 8:20 AM

     

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.